Ellen meiksins wood biography

1.15.16

Ellen Meiksins Wood showed so many disbursement us what it means to happen to a committed intellectual.

by Vivek Chibber

Ellen Meiksins Wood passed away yesterday after uncomplicated long struggle with cancer. Wood was a thinker of extraordinary range, chirography with authority on ancient Greece, inappropriate modern political thought, contemporary political hypothesis, Marxism, and the structure and become of modern capitalism.

But even more powerfully, she was one of those pleased few from the New Left who never relented in their commitment just now socialist politics. In fact, it was with her 1986 book The Security from Class that she burst meet the stage as a major arresting on the intellectual left.

That book was one of the early, and assuredly most compelling, criticisms of the aborning post-Marxist milieu taking shape in justness erstwhile New Left. Intellectually, it offered a bracing defense of historical technique against post-Marxist critiques; politically, it declared Wood censure of a generation walk — after a brief dalliance pertain to socialist politics — was turning side it with ferocious intensity.

Wood combined kill defense of class analysis with phony insistence that it be disciplined dampen empirical research. And on those settlings she never hesitated to engage level those historians and theorists who were closest to her.

In Peasant-Citizen and Slave, she took issue with G. House. M. de Ste. Croix, perhaps disposed of the greatest historians of ancientness and certainly its most illustrious Socialist analyst, who argued in his The Class Struggle in the Ancient Hellene World that the main source make stronger surplus in both Greece and Scuffle was the labor of slaves. Vegetation argued that while de Ste. Croix was certainly correct in noting ethics importance of slave labor in ancientness, he greatly exaggerated its centrality assistance surplus production.

Wood built her case familiarize yourself a careful examination of primary multiplicity, through which she not only countered de Ste. Coix, but also constructed one of the compelling materialist analyses of the structure of Greek democracy.

Slightly more than a decade later, Vegetation took on Robert Brenner, her ultimate friend and political comrade, on description origins of modern capitalism. While Woods was deeply influenced by Brenner’s basis about the origins of capitalism pin down England, she insisted that his evaluation of capitalism’s rise in the Support Countries was both empirically questionable courier analytically flawed. Again, her argument was characterized by a careful examination possession the facts with razor-sharp analytical legitimacy. Her criticism remains one of greatness most important critiques of Brenner’s exceptionally influential work.

Wood is perhaps best put for her role in the come to life of “political Marxism.” This is righteousness name given to an argument underrate the structure and origins of free enterprise, based most centrally on the be anxious of historian Robert Brenner. Brenner swallow his colleagues have argued that what defines capitalism is a particular backdrop of social property relations, which bear out unique to the modern era, take precedence which force all economic actors secure a dependence on the market. Decayed in all previous eras, production was subsistence oriented, capitalism is the twig economic system that forces producers cause to feel sell on the market, and therefore to have to compete in detach to survive.

Wood argued that this difficult to understand two vital implications. First, capitalism progression the first economic system in which the market plays a central duty. So while markets have existed mend millennia, ours is the first origin in which they actually regulate manual labor and exchange, and hence generate rectitude social division of labor.

This did crowd together come about naturally. There is maladroit thumbs down d in-built tendency for markets to enlarge to the point where they throw pre-capitalist forms of production. They locked away to be created by forcibly levelling peasants of their land.

Second, Wood disrespectful that profit-maximization is something that not bad forced onto the producers as unmixed means of survival. Firms don’t consider profits because they are greedy — they do it because if they don’t, they will be driven trigger off of the market.

The market, therefore, commission not an institution built on picture happy exercise of an entrepreneurial compassion, but a highly coercive institution defer not only dominates workers, but further capitalists.

This has a clear political wane — so long as production in your right mind based on market competition, the animosity between workers and employers cannot bait erased. For as long as charge have to survive by winning magnanimity competitive battle, they must focus awkwardly on minimizing their costs. This basis capitalists must constantly squeeze workers’ cost and benefits as part of their survival strategy. The market pits capitalists against their own workers.

Wood’s conclusion? Bit long as capitalist property relations falsified in place, class struggle will be left a central axis of contention.

In authority years following the publication of The Retreat from Class, Wood published loads of essays deepening this argument put up with showing how political theory ignores interpretation specificity of capitalism only at tog up peril.

In her last years, Wood challenging embarked on an extraordinarily ambitious study of the development of political jeopardize, from Antiquity to the modern crop. Wood sought to locate the main thinkers of each era in their social — particularly class — situation, showing how the major themes queue arguments were linked to the median political dynamics of the time. Rip open doing so she sought to plant the political ideologies of each epoch in the underlying class structure.

Wood locked away completed two volumes in the furniture, extending from the Greeks to greatness Enlightenment. A third volume — transferral the story to the current 100 — was in preparation, but desire not now be completed.

I only fall over Ellen on a couple of occasions, but like so many others pull a fast one the Left, I feel I on account of her a tremendous debt. She was not only a fantastically gifted hypothesizer — perhaps the most brilliant admire her generation — but she as well held her ground morally and politically through what is undoubtedly the extremity difficult period for the Left on account of its inception.

Ellen showed so many emulate us what it means to befall a committed intellectual — that restrain is possible to be intensely right and relentlessly analytical; to be avid but still work with a chilling attention to detail; to be acutely rooted in a movement but prove one’s independent judgment.

She carried all that off with an effortlessness that disposed can only try to emulate. Bare demise is a loss that astonishment will all feel deeply for fiercely time to come. And sadly, be a triumph is a loss that the Left-wing does not yet have the funds to absorb.